Opinion: Reforming Alaska's education system

Has been updated: 16 few minutes ago release date: 16 few minutes ago

Alaska's education landscape is at a critical juncture, with some calling for an increase in Basic Student Allocation (BSA) funding, but no changes within the system are expected. But we differ from traditional stories. We are proud of our diverse collaboration, and our perspectives range from interested students and parents to those actively involved in public education activities. Our collective stance is based on a critical examination of the evidence. Credible data clearly shows that Alaska's public education system is well-funded, but the money is not being properly allocated in the ways that will have the most impact.

We believe that increasing the BSA should only be considered in tandem with comprehensive reforms aimed at providing families with more and better options. Increased funding must be conditional on implementing reforms that prioritize effective resource allocation, strengthen teacher-student relationships, and ultimately deliver better outcomes for children.

One of the core tenets of this approach is the belief that families don't just want more educational options; They crave better choices. The emphasis here is on the quality, not just the quantity, of the options available. Whether in a traditional neighborhood school, a charter school, or some form of blended homeschooling, the goal is to ensure that all students receive a valuable, high-quality education that meets their needs and aspirations. It's about being accessible.

Another core belief we share is that what makes children look forward to going to school is often the relationships they have with their peers and teachers. Proponents argue that fostering a positive and engaging learning environment depends on investing in the interpersonal dynamics within the classroom. This means a shift in focus from bureaucratic concerns to fostering meaningful connections between students and teachers, fostering an environment where students can grow both academically and emotionally.

Additionally, families trust their child's teachers more than the school district's school board when making decisions that are in the child's best interests. School boards must make unpopular but necessary decisions. For example, if a school board chooses to leave a low-enrollment school in place rather than integrate it with nearby schools, resources will be diverted from students in other parts of the district. We need to shift our focus from maintaining schools with low enrollment to redirecting resources to initiatives that benefit more students and ensuring funding gets to classrooms and teachers rather than being swallowed up by bureaucracy. .

This debate extends beyond the traditional dichotomy of charter schools vs. neighborhood schools vs. hybrid schools. The main goal is not to promote a particular educational model, but to adopt an “all of the above” strategy. This approach recognizes the diversity of student needs and preferences and aims to provide a wide range of educational options that meet the diverse demands of Alaskan families.

Lawmakers need to aggressively challenge the status quo that is failing to meet the needs of thousands of Alaskan families. In Alaska, more than 23% of children have already dropped out of traditional neighborhood schools, indicating dissatisfaction with the system. It is not too much to ask for equal support for these alternative options and efforts to provide a greater variety of options that better meet the needs of an ever-changing student population.

Pushing for increased Base Student Allocation (BSA) funding in Alaska should only be considered in tandem with calls for comprehensive education reform. The economic boost focuses on improving teacher-student relationships, empowering educators, and directing resources to initiatives that benefit the majority of students, creating more and better choices for families. It must be conditional on your commitment to provide it. By challenging the status quo, we can create an educational environment that is more responsive, adaptive, and ultimately successful in meeting the unique needs of Alaskan families.

Brandi Pennington, Thomas R. Daley, Michelle Hodel, Sheryl Markwood, Sami Graham, John and Beth Hillyer, Romney Taylor, Kristin Robbins, Evelyn Dutton and Dee McKee Alaska residents are concerned about K-12 education.

The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the Anchorage Daily News, which welcomes a wide range of viewpoints.To submit your work for consideration, please send an email Commentary(at)adn.com. Submissions of less than 200 words should be sent to: Letters@adn.com or Click here to submit from any web browser.Read all guidelines for letters and comments here.