You're probably trying to make the best choices possible when feeding yourself and your family. But is what's sold at your grocery store or local market the healthiest, most sustainable option? New research from McGill University shows that most human diets are high in meat and sugar, making them less healthy. There have been some alarming findings revealing the above risks and negative impacts on the environment.
Human diet past and present
Just a few decades ago, modern diets tended to be simpler, less focused on fresh, year-round produce, and more focused on home-cooked meals. Fresh fruits and vegetables were available seasonally, but the variety was often more limited than today.
Today, despite vastly expanded nutritional choices and knowledge, eating habits continue to deteriorate. A question arises here. With so much variety and nutritional information readily available in supermarkets, why isn't the average person's diet becoming healthier?
Researchers from McGill University and the International Food Policy Research Institute conducted a multi-year study to analyze the evolution of Canada's food supply.
Their goal was to understand how changes in food availability and consumption patterns affect human health and the environment.
The findings demonstrate a troubling mismatch between what is available in the food system and what constitutes optimal nutrition for both individuals and the planet.
The unfortunate reality of modern people's diet
To assess how well modern human diets support healthy eating, researchers needed a reliable benchmark. They chose her two highly reputable sources.
- Canadian food guide: This government-issued resource provides evidence-based recommendations to Canadians about the types and amounts of foods they need to promote health and prevent chronic disease.
- EAT-Lancet commission: This global panel of scientists was convened to create a planet-healthy diet that emphasizes optimal nutrition for humans, while ensuring the long-term sustainability of food production and protecting the environment. .
Researchers closely analyzed nearly 60 years of data from Canadian farms and food companies. They wanted to understand the complex relationships between what is produced, how it is processed, and the products that ultimately become readily available to consumers.
Unfortunately, this detailed analysis revealed an unfortunate trend. This means that the foods most readily available to the average modern person do not meet the standards recommended by the Canadian Food Guide or the EAT-Lancet Committee.
This clearly shows that despite what we know about healthy and sustainable eating, our current food system does not consistently support those choices.
food supply
“One of the most striking findings of this study is the clear imbalance in the food supply. Excess consumption of red meat and sugar is significant, and these products are linked to a range of health problems when consumed in excess. “It's been associated with this for a long time,” says Dr. Vincent Abe Inge. student in the Department of Bioresource Engineering at McGill University and the study's lead author.
Sadly, we don't see an increase in healthier options. “On the contrary, there is a noticeable lack of healthier alternatives such as nuts, legumes and vegetables,” continues Abe Inge.
The impact of food on the environment
We often overlook the impact that what we eat has on the environment. But a meat-based diet has implications far beyond personal health.
Although animal products make up a small portion of our total food sources, they leave a disproportionately large environmental footprint.
This study took a closer look at the specific environmental costs associated with foods of animal origin.
- Greenhouse gas emissions: Livestock production is a major contributor to greenhouse gases and plays a major role in climate change.
- Water usage: Raising animals for food requires large amounts of water, both for the animals themselves and for the crops grown to feed them. This high water demand puts a strain on water resources.
- Land use: Livestock farming requires large areas of land for both grazing and growing forage crops. This land use often leads to deforestation and biodiversity loss.
Essentially, this study highlights that our over-reliance on animal-based foods imposes costs that are higher than what it takes to feed the planet's population. A shift to a more plant-based diet has the potential to significantly reduce these harmful environmental impacts.
From better eating habits to a better environment
While this study highlights that reducing meat and sugar consumption is beneficial, there are broader steps humans in modern societies can take to enhance both health and the environment. I'm emphasizing.
Alternatives to plant-based proteins
You don't have to adopt a vegetarian or vegan lifestyle, but replacing meat with plant-based proteins like beans and lentils in a few meals a week can make a big difference.
This change not only supports individual health by reducing intake of animal fats and cholesterol, but also because plant-based foods generally require less resources such as water and land than meat. It also reduces environmental impact.
more fruits and vegetables
Continually increasing your fruit and vegetable consumption is not only a healthy choice, but also an environmentally friendly choice.
These foods are rich in essential health-promoting nutrients and are more sustainable to produce than many animal-based products.
The lower environmental impact is due to factors such as reduced greenhouse gas emissions and less intensive land use.
Seeking a better diet and environment
Individuals have the power to influence markets by demanding healthier and more sustainable food options. This can be achieved through purchasing decisions and by expressing the need for changes in food policy.
Consumers can encourage businesses and policy makers to prioritize access to nutritious and environmentally friendly foods, which can lead to far-reaching changes in food systems and policies.
Changes are possible
This study was not designed to make individuals feel guilty about their dietary choices. Instead, the aim is to draw broader attention to systemic problems in our diets and their impact on health and the environment.
Understanding these challenges is the first step to positive change. This research sheds light on the disconnect between the way we produce and consume food and its impact on health and the environment, enabling consumers, policy makers and food industry leaders to take action. I will give you the power to wake up.
The focus is on advocating for solutions.
- Informed consumer choice: Increasing awareness of these issues allows individuals to make small but impactful changes to their diets, creating demand for healthier and more sustainable options.
- Policy changes: The findings highlight the need for policy interventions that could support a more balanced food supply, encourage the production and consumption of plant-based foods, and discourage incentives for foods with excessive environmental impacts. It's highlighted.
- Industry transformation: Food producers and retailers have a critical role to play in evolving their products and practices to meet the needs of both people and the planet.
“We urgently need to adopt a holistic approach that prioritizes not only public health but also the health of the planet. By aligning our food supply more closely with recommended dietary guidelines, we can ensure a healthier and more sustainable future.” ” concludes Vincent Abe-Inge.
The entire study was published in the journal world food security.
—–
Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for fascinating articles, exclusive content and the latest updates.
Check out EarthSnap, a free app from Eric Ralls and Earth.com.
—–
